Total Pageviews

Popular Posts

Friday, May 29, 2020

Clare Boothe Luce

City Safari: Fame And Fortune On The Luce

Fri, May 29, 2020
By Thom Nickels
Contributing Editor

When I inherited my great aunt’s desk (purchased by her father from Freeman’s Auction House in 1934), I knew the contents of the desk fairly well. I knew that among the scrapbooks and photographs there was a long typewritten letter signed by Clare Boothe Luce, playwright, member of Congress, editor at Vogue and Ambassador to Italy (appointed by President Eisenhower) in 1953. 

        Boothe Luce, a Republican feminist, was a hero of my great aunt’s. I dismissed my great aunt’s adulations then because Boothe Luce was a Republican, but the letter forced me to take another look at her life, a world filled with psychedelics, elevator rides, stuttering and the glamour of fame.  

         Boothe Luce dropped out of school at age 16, married a Manhattan millionaire at 20 with whom she had one daughter. Her husband’s ribald alcoholism caused her to seek a divorce in 1949, two years into the marriage. The death of her daughter in an automobile accident caused her look into psychoanalysis and religion in 1945. 

         Psychoanalysis did not work for her but a chance meeting with Bishop Fulton Sheen (my great aunt was fond of saying that they met in an elevator) initiated a series of meetings which resulted in Luce’s conversion to Catholicism.  That conversion did not come easy. Thomas Reeves in his biography of Bishop Sheen, "The Life and Times of Fulton J. Sheen,”(2002), writes that Luce was a "tough convert,” who "lashed out at Sheen” frequently. She did not swim softly across the calm Tiber.

         According to Boothe Luce’s biographer, Sylvia Jukes Morris (Price of Fame: The Honorable Clare Boothe Luce), after her conversion she found it difficult to write "nasty plays about women.” 

         Boothe Luce, who wrote her famous play, The Womenin three days, gave up playwriting after her conversion. A Miami Heraldreviewer, commenting on the second volume of Luce’s biography, wrote:  "Conversion ruined her creativity. Henceforth she became preachy; her prose, which had been praised for its acerbic honesty, grew hesitant and predictable. The threat of damnation did not stop her from attempting suicide on multiple occasions over her husband’s infidelity.”



         The narcissistic and overbearing Boothe Luce never lost her remarkable sense of humor. When it came to men she expected them to give up everything for her. 

         Boothe Lucenever wanted to stop living the life of a young woman. At age 80 she told Morris that she was "having an attack of the dismals.” Morris asked her what she meant. Boothe Luce responded, "It’s Saturday night and I don’t have any bows. A homosexual Admiral would be good. He’d come in a uniform but at the end of the evening I wouldn’t have to put out.”  

        When Clare Boothe met Henry Luce he was the world- famous publisher of TIMEmagazine.  He was also married with two children. Clare wanted to have an affair but she told him to settle his affairs first and then meet her in Europe. Morris maintains that Henry Luce always "had trouble sexually.” His sexual problems with Clare had everything to do with putting her on a pedestal. "After two years of marriage he still couldn’t make love to Clare at all…as someone once said, it’s hard to make love on a pedestal.”   

         When President Eisenhower appointed Boothe Luce Ambassador to Italy the Italian people felt insulted because Boothe Luce was not a man. Boothe Luce was also treated in less than ambassadorial terms by her fellow diplomats in the United States. Yet after only one week in Italy, Ambassador Clare Boothe Luce managed to win the hearts and mind of the Italian people.



        In 1965-66 in Miami, Clare met another cultural celebrity in an elevator. This time it was Abbie Hoffman who had the chutzpah to ask Luce if she had ever taken LSD. Luce said she had, to which Hoffmann replied, "I took it once,” to which Boothe Luce, a frequent LSD user, exclaimed, "Only once?” Morris writes that Luce’s departing words to Hoffman were, "See you in Nirvana.”    

         The letter from Clare Boothe Luce to my great aunt is dated 1956 and was written in response to a letter about a long forgotten minor political issue. While hardly a collector of autographs, I did check the signed letter’s possible worth and found it to be somewhere near $165.00. (This comes nowhere near the value of the signed personal letter to me from Elizabeth Taylor, valued at $1200, another story for another time.) 
The letter to my great aunt caused me to look deeper into Boothe Luce’s life, as well as her famous husband.  

         I discovered that Henry Luce (1898-1967) had a serious stutter as a child. Luce’s stutter was apparently caused by a tonsillectomy at age 7 when the anesthesia wore off before the operation was over. This left him with a stutter. The stutter caused him to be made fun of and mocked as a student. When he transferred to an English boarding school a "speech correctionist” taught him to take a short breath before each sentence. This alleviated much of the problem but his stutter never entirely disappeared.



        The stuttering connection interested me because I stuttered as a child. I’d go full red in the face, say "um” a million times barely able to get a few words out before gasping for breath. In high school I’d plead with certain teachers to allow me to do written classroom reports rather than oral ones. I was still stuttering as a freshman in college. The stutter left years later when I took a Learning Annex course on public speaking in Center City. The teacher, a former NYC ballet dancer, discovered how to fix it: She taught me how to breathe, a la Henry Luce. 

         With Henry Luce, the more he slept, the more his stuttering seemed to abate. At one point Luce was talked into taking LSD by Clare, whom Morris says always wanted to try the latest thing. In 1959 LSD was the latest thing; it was also unregulated and there was no Dr. Timothy Leary on the scene. LSD was not only prescribed by psychiatrists for depressives and criminals but for the intelligentsia, who flocked to it as a way to enhance the mind. Clare took her LSD under the direction of English philosopher Gerald Head. "She always had good trips,” Morris said in one interview. 

        No jumping out of windows thinking she could fly for Clare! 
         When she talked Henry into taking LSD she may have heard from Head or others that the drug has something to do with the relationship between psychedelics and speech fluency.



          Did Henry Luce take LSD to help alleviate his stuttering? 

         The marriage of psychedelics and speech fluency has been written about over the past few decades. In a 1970 piece on the effects of psychedelics on Language, Stanley Krippner observes that,  "A permanent state of altered consciousness is neither practical nor desirable. However, the individual may return to the world of imprinting, conditioning, acculturation, and verbalization with new insights if his psychedelic session has been properly guided.

         Many other references to LSD and speech problems pop up in the world of so called independent drug journalism. In a blog entitled Speakingfreely (the author identified only as T.H.) we learn that,   
         "….While under the influence of the mushrooms, an amazing change had occurred: I was neither stuttering, nor cycling through potentialities in my mind for word or phrasing substitutions….This was a profound experience at the time, because my stuttering had recently become more severe and was increasingly disrupting my life. Then, as if by magic, the mushrooms I ate that night induced a phenomenon of full-fluency that I had never imagined possible.”

        Henry Luce became a staunch advocate of LSD and even promoted its use in articles in many of his magazines. 

          It should be noted that the taking of LSD was once regarded as a sacramental-like experience, an exercise in expanding one’s consciousnesses. It had not yet become a frivolous party drug "just to see the colors” or the face of an owl in the dining room wallpaper.  
  

Thursday, May 28, 2020

The Athenaeum of Philadelphia

Join us online for this event on Philadelphia Mansions!

Join us online for this event on Philadelphia Mansions!

About this Event

The Grandeur of Philadelphia's Past Revealed: Philadelphia's grand mansions and architectural treasures reflect its status in American history. For each Greek Revival home and Corinthian column lies a compelling story of the people behind them. Author Thom Nickels presents the city’s most iconic homes, whether it’s Historic Strawberry Mansion, Elstowe Mansion in Elkins Park (that became a scared space after its conversion to a Dominican convent), Henry McIIhenny’s cramped quarters at 1914 Rittenhouse, or the saga of architect Thomas Nevell who designed Mount Pleasant. Why is Philadelphia's historic Morris House on South 8th Street the real President’s House as opposed to the structure at 6th and Market Streets? What about Mother and Father Divine’s Woodmont estate in Gladwyne? What happened when Jim Jones of Jonestown infamy visited Woodmont in an attempt to take over the Peace Mission movement? How is it that mansions, such as Loch Aerie designed by Addison Hutton in the rolling hills of Chester County, have survived abandonment, homeless invasions and motorcycle gangs, only to resurface as reinvented edifices.  
Thom Nickels is the author of thirteen books, including: Learn to Do a Bad Thing Well: Looking for Johnny Bobbitt (2018); Philadelphia. Literary Philadelphia: A History of Prose & Poetry in the City of Brotherly Love (2015); Out in History (2005), Philadelphia Architecture (2005), Manayunk (2001), and Spore (2010). Nickels was nominated for a Lambda Literary Award for his book, Two Novellas: Walking Water & After All This (1990) and awarded the Philadelphia AIA Lewis Mumford Award for Architectural Journalism in 2005. His poetry has appeared in Van Gogh’s Ear anthology (Paris). His column, Different Strokes in the Philadelphia Welcomat (1980s) was the first out gay column in a mainstream newspaper in the nation. He has written for Huff Post, Passport Magazine, The Philadelphia Inquirer, Philadelphia Magazine, PJ Media (Los Angeles) and City Journal (New York City). His essay on his time as a conscientious objector during the Vietnam War was published by The New Oxford Review. He is a weekly columnist for the Philadelphia Free Press and the Philadelphia Irish Edition.. His essay on Agnes Repplier was the cover feature essay in the Winter issue of The American Catholic Studies Journal (Villanova University), 2015. He was the featured speaker at the Walt Whitman Annual Birthday Party, Tuesday, May 23, 2017 at the Walt Whitman House in Camden.
His book, Philadelphia Mansions: Stories and Characters Behind the Walls was published by The History Press in March 2018.
If you are interested in purchasing a copy of this book, you can do so here:https://www.headhousebooks.com/book/9781540228574

The Zoom link will be sent the day of the event through email.

Friday, May 22, 2020

Exodus from Big Cities?

City Safari: Is Covid Bursting The Balloons Of The Urban Paradigm?

Signs of life in small towns
Wed, May 20, 2020
By Thom Nickels
Contributing Editor

Right after Covid-19 hit a new person moved into my neighborhood. A small moving van appeared one day and the lone mover, a guy in his early twenties, began moving his stuff into a house not far from mine. The friend helping him move left at the end of the day, after which the newcomer parked his car (with New York license plates on the wrong side of the street near another neighbor’s driveway. The ex-New Yorker’s parking blunder was so in- your- face I knew that he’d soon get an earful from disgruntled neighbors. That’s exactly what happened because a week later he was parking his car on the right side of the street.


The fact that the neighborhood newcomer was from New York said it all. Here was obviously another New York City refugee who could no longer take the inhumane density of an overcrowded city in Covid-19 lockdown. Here was another New Yorker who had decided that Philadelphia was better than New York when it came to a pandemic. Here was another millennial joining up with renters his age, all of them crammed into a small house like King Oscar sardines.  Four of five people living on top of one another because rents are (artificially) inflated and exorbitant, another indication of something untoward, eating at the soul of society.

New York City, however, has plenty of company when it comes to overcrowded cities during a pandemic.

My new neighbor chose Philadelphia as a safe haven even though many Philadelphians are having second thoughts about living here. If my new neighbor was really prescient, perhaps he should have gone one step further and moved deeper into the state.

I’m thinking of towns like Elizabethtown, Plum, Whitehall, Johnstown or even West Mifflin. West Mifflin is situated on the beautiful Monongalia River, just minutes from Pittsburgh where one can rent an apartment for under $600.00 a month. A small room in a small house in Fishtown-Richmond (with kitchen privileges) will cost you well over $1,000.   

If Covid-19 has taught us anything, it’s made many urban types like myself realize that we don’t need the big city cultural accruements we thought we needed to live an intellectually rich life. 

We don’t need to see every new play at the Arden or the Lantern; we don’t need to see every new art exhibit in town; we can get by without seeing the latest offering from Ballet X or the Pennsylvania Ballet. We can even get along without keeping tabs on the Bearded Ladies Cabaret. These things are good but we don’t need them. Forget the noble attempt at continuing the city’s arts and cultural scene with virtual performances because in the end everything ‘virtual’ comes up short, especially that most oxymoronic virtual event of all: the virtual cocktail party.  



As I see it, one needs only good books to keep the mind fluctuating along intellectual currents. One can take books anywhere, to the mountains, to the sea, even to a log cabin in Centralia, Pennsylvania. 

Striking out for small towns far from the massive cities on the east coast can be a scary move for committed urbanites.  

The New York Timesran the following May 2020 story: America’s Biggest Cities Were Already Losing Their Allure; What next?The article describes the plight of 24-year old Nina Brajovic who moved back in with her parents in Pittsburgh to escape the Covid-infected wall-to-wall-density of New York. 
         The Timesreported:
         She is now savoring life’s slowness, eating her father’s soup and watching movies on an L-shaped couch with her mom. ‘Part of it feels like, why am I even living in New York?’ said Ms. Brajovic, 24, who pays $1,860 in rent each month for her share of an apartment with two roommates in Manhattan. ‘Why am I always paying all of this rent?’ 


         
The exodus from big cities is happening all over the world. The trend has been growing for several years but Covid-19 has pushed it over the top. Covid might be seen as Act One of possible future world "disasters” or issues, such as scarcity of food. Moving to smaller towns, of course, is expensive. Uprooting oneself for the sake of the future might not be a pleasant thing to contemplate although for many in the coming decades it could be a lifesaver. In rural areas, for instance, one can grow large food gardens but try doing that except as a balcony experiment in a Center City condo.  
          
True Activist, an online publication, ran a piece entitled 30 Cities People Are Ditching.Philadelphia was not among the list but New York, Los Angeles, San Francisco and Detroit were. 


         
In 2019 The Wall Street Journalfeatured an article about millennials leaving big citiesCNN got into the act when they reported:"Coronavirus is making some people rethink where they want to live.”    
         
Business Insiderjoined the fray with this offering: "People are leaving cities for rural areas.” 

USAToday had its own spin: "Get Me Out of Here! Americans flee Crowded cities amid Covid-19, Consider Permanent Move.”

There’s a lot of snobbery associated with city living, and moving to remote towns in the country will not win you the love of urban progressives. As the National Reviewreported:           

"Meanwhile, it is not hard to find examples of urban progressives looking at rural America with a combination of contempt, disdain, pity, smug superiority . . . At some point the Coronavirus crisis will end, but one of the extraordinarily difficult lessons of this ordeal is that the catastrophic scenarios that sound like something out of science fiction can happen in real life, and that the vast majority of us are at the mercy of fate in these scenarios……Whichever way SARS-CoV-2 jumped into humans — a lab accident, wet markets, exotic-animal trader, a farmer using bat guano for fertilizer — it can happen again with another virus.”  

The realization that we don’t "need” the things that big cities provide—theater, ballet,  or 101 ‘Diversity Consultants’ on every corporate board---is a comforting discovery indeed.

Johnstown, Pennsylvania


The 2010’s were the famous migration years when millennials flocked into big cities. That’s when Philadelphia’s foodie culture began to flourish, when it was difficult to pick up a regional magazine or newspaper without seeing features on the city’s burgeoning restaurant industry. Some observers then worried that the city was banking too heavily on restaurants and food as a destination selling point. That’s all changed now. Covid, for the time being anyway, has pretty much decimated the city’s foodie culture with its celebrity chefs and glamour press openings.

Prior to the millennial stampede in the 2010’s, it was the so called ‘empty nesters,’ or couples with grown children who left the suburbs to experience the excitement of living in Center City. Part of that excitement now includes being trapped in high rise condos under lockdown rules that forbid inviting in guests and hosting dinner parties 

That’s especially ironic when you consider that the whole point of urban life is mingling with people and freedom. But what happens when that is taken away; what happens when the urban dream becomes a prison?    

Perhaps it takes a pandemic to get people to open their minds. Is there life outside of Philadelphia and Pittsburgh despite that old mantra about Pennsylvania being Alabama outside of these two cities?

Alabama at this point doesn’t seem so bad because who knows what’s headed down the pike. Now that the unbelievable has occurred; now that science fiction has become reality, the course is set for other unbelievable occurrences. 
Meeting the ‘unbelievable’ with the ‘unbelievable’ might be the answer. 

That might mean moving to a town like Johnston, known as the third fastest shrinking city in the United States (and once 3rdon a list to be bombed by the Russians during the Cold War because of its plentiful mills).

Johnston is a beautiful city-- in ruins. It can trace its abandonment by residents to the closing of its mills but it also has a besieged history, namely the 1889 flood when a bursting dam devastated the city. But it has a thriving arts scene, a symphony orchestra, a museum of art and a magazine called Johnston Magazine.  

It’s also a city with incredible western USA style mountain views, plenty of fresh air and acres and acres of ground for new vegetable gardens.   



    
      

Monday, May 18, 2020

Philadelphia's End The Lockdown Protest

City Safari: Philadelphia’s End The Lockdown Protest

Photo: Protest. Stock image.
Wed, May 13, 2020
By Thom Nickels
Contributing Editor

Last week I made the decision to hop the Market Street El and head to City Hall to observe an End the Lockdown protest. Reading about the protest online I learned that it would mainly be a procession of vehicles circling City Hall. A car protest, of course, leaves a lot to be desired but given the current crackdown on large gatherings of people and the emphasis on social distancing, it was to be expected. 

         I didn’t expect much in the way of a protest, however. If this had been a free Mumia Abu-Jamal protest, or a rally celebrating Meek Mill, perhaps there would have been hundreds of people near or around Dilworth Plaza. While End the Lockdown protests have generated hundreds, even thousands of participants in other cities in the nation and across the world that would not be the case in Philadelphia. Generally—historically—Philadelphia has never been much of a ‘protest-marching’ city. Whatever the cause or issue—gay rights, women’s rights, Black Lives Matter—the protest numbers in the streets here have always been lower than they’ve been in other cities in the country. 

         When I emerged from the SEPTA clothespin subway exit near City Hall, I spotted scattered albeit small groups of people on the Plaza. Trump supporters, old grey haired veteran types in faded baseball caps carrying huge American flags and holding Trump 2020 posters.

         Walking deeper into the Plaza, I noticed small groups of women, none of them wearing masks, earnestly engaged in conversations with passersby. They carried small print (homemade) End the Lockdown signs. The drivers in the cars circling City Hall honked their horns vigorously as some waved miniature American flags from car windows. Round and round they went, waving and honking to onlookers. I looked around for signs of a counter protest but saw nothing. What I did see were random street people types talking to the air. One man seemed especially angry but his indecipherable comments made it hard to know where he was coming from. One man did speak clearly and commented that he wished that "the Left people would get out there with their signs.” Ironically, he was not wearing a mask and probably had the Trump 20020 supporters in mind when he said this.

         Police officers were everywhere, lines of them in yellow vests with some odd undercover types in suits glued to their phones. This was typical City Hall protocol. I watched as two old veteran codgers pulled a Macy’s like rack draped with Trump sweatshirts, T-shirts, buttons and MAGA hats. The sight was a real anomaly in this left progressive city, a catchy photo op moment in a town where the norm tends to be political philosophies and activism bred in Mt. Airy and Powelton Village kitchens.  

         Many things crossed my mind as I stood there watching the cars circle City Hall under grey skies and dustings of light rain.

         My first thought was how some on Facebook, when they write posts about doing things outdoors with friends and family, go out of their way to add that they did this or that "at a safe social distance.” This mantra has now become part of our everyday language: "We had lunch on the patio, each of us of course "at a safe social distance,”; we played quoits in the backyard and laughed till we cried, "at a safe social distance”; we rode our bicycles along a country road, "at a safe social distance”; we toasted marshmallows at night around a campfire "at a safe social distance.”

         It’s not keeping a safe social distance that I’m criticizing but the compulsive need that some people have to make sure they appear "correct” in public when describing what they’ve been up to. This creepy reaffirmation might only be a warding off of potential attacks and criticism from covid ideologues, many of whom can get pretty ugly when it comes to virtue signaling and scolding people for not obeying the rules.

       Fanatics, as they say, are everywhere. 

       The social distancing mantra has even affected casual phone chats with good friends. Recently one of my friends told me, "I took a walk to Rittenhouse Square the other day and I ran into my good friend ----- and we had a good chat while keeping a safe social distance.” Okay, terrific, you get a gold star on your forehead and a plaque on Hollywood Blvd. but do I really need to hear this? I’m not your covid-19 parole officer, and I’m not going to report you to anyone if you spoke to your friend two feet apart instead of six. I won’t even report you if you two rubbed noses at the end of the conversation.

Getting back to that City Hall protest, I was startled to read in The Philadelphia Business Journalthat there were counter protests at the rally.   I did not see any counter protests. Perhaps they went by in a flash when I had my back turned, or perhaps they appeared fifteen minutes before I arrived at City Hall. Whatever the case, they didn’t hang around very long. The only protests I spotted were lone individuals who seemed to be talking to themselves.

         The Philadelphia Business Journalreported on the rally before it took place and quoted PhillyReopen’s (organizers of the protest) comment on Twitter:  

"Let's fill Broad Street and Market Street, from all sides, circling City Hall, and let Mayor Kenney, whose administration still collects their full paychecks while they raise our taxes, know that we won't be left behind and won't comply to his disastrous budget plan.”

            As someone once said, "Thus do we build castles in the air when flushed with wine and conquest.” 

            End the lockdown protests tend to enrage certain types of Philadelphia journalists.  

A writer for Philadelphia Magazine, in writing about a massive end the lockdown protest in Harrisburg in April, wrote: 

"These individuals, by flouting social distancing mandates and potentially exposing others to a deadly virus that spreads in crowds as a way to tout their political views, are threatening the public safety of countless others. It’s one thing to disagree on politics; it’s another thing to rebel against the Department of Health’s current mandates, against science, against basic math.”

            But what about those scientists who dispute the scientists supported by WHO, or the physicians and experts who take issue with the so-called numbers and "basic math?” 

            Calling End the lockdown protesters "terrorists” reminds me of something I read by Elizabeth Nolan Brown last month in Reason: 
 "After last week's protest around the Michigan Capitol, a picture of someone holding a large swastika flag that said "TRUMP PENCE" began circulating on social media as a sign of the supposed Nazi leanings of Trump supporters and the people protesting. But after some viral outrage about the kind of people the conservative organizers of these protests were in cahoots with, it turns out that the picture in question actually came from a March 2 Bernie Sanders rally in Boise, Idaho.” 




Censorship of alternate views concerning the virus and those protesting the lock down on You Tube, Facebook and other social media has become its own pandemic, so much so that—as many have stated-- one has to wonder if the collateral damage from all of this will be greater than the damage inflicted by the virus. 

         Mayor Lightfoot of Chicago, in a truly horrifying, angry speech (her face bunched up like a clenched fist) threatened anyone—businesses, etc—that broke lockdown rules. "We will shut you down,” she said, "We will take you to jail.” The only thing missing from her speech was the heel-clicking sound of "Sieg Heil!”



         Bill Maher, hardly a Trump fan, questioned the necessity of a continued lockdown and stay-at-home orders. "Hospital inspired infections kill more people than covid-19,” Maher said. As does lacking health insurance and being jobless in a ruined economy. "We need the news to calm down and treat us like adults. Trump calls you fake news…don’t make him be right!”

The views of dissenting physicians and scientists are squashed at every turn. Whether it’s Dr. Dan Erickson and Dr. Artin Massihi in California, whose famous 5,000,000 hit You Tube video on covid-19 was removed because it "went against community standards,” or Dr. Judy Mikovits’ testimony on You Tube (also removed) that countered the "Shut up and obey” narrative that has people hiding in their homes and fearing for their lives. The list goes on to include reasoned testimony from world renowned Epidemiologist Dr. Knut Wittkowski, whose videos, miraculously, still remain on You Tube.  



         One can disagree with a Dr. Judy or a Dr. Erickson and present the medical facts as they see them. But let’s have debate and open dialogue and not censor or eradicate opposing views because some (or many) find them disturbing, intimidating or "false.” Shutting down the opposition only increases the opposition. Censorship lends credibility to banned counter narratives. 

         I look forward to the day when Philadelphia’s lockdown restrictions are lifted. Like many people, I need a haircut, and it would also be nice to be able to go to church again. During this time I’ve noticed that some friends and acquaintances have become so immersed in self-isolation that they’ve lost the ability to reach out and communicate. This might be the psychological effects of long term lockdown. The lockdown has affected their psyche, forcing them to retreat further into themselves. I know because it’s happened to me, and it’s an odd phenomenon to say the least. 



Philadelphia has faired pretty well during this trying time. The police here have not acted irrationally by ticketing or harassing people who might violate a rule or two. I’ve yet to hear of police breaking up private patio or beer parties which sometimes occur in my neighborhood. Some pawnshops and phone stores are still open in Kensington. I’ve also heard my fair share of stories about barbershops that have a back door to let in select customers.  I’ve even met massage therapists and tattoo artists who have quietly moved their businesses to their homes so that they can work to pay their bills. 

         As oft been said:  You gotta do what you gotta do.  



Wednesday, May 6, 2020

Anais Nin Comes to Harvard

     
 I’ve collected a number of books over the years. While my library is significant it could not be described as endless but then again that description depends on who’s looking at it. Unlike some book collectors, I don’t arrange my books alphabetically except for a few favorite authors. I have a number of autographed books, but even these books tend to be scattered among the many.  
     Lately I’ve had plenty of time to review the contents of my library. I discovered that I still have books that I bought when I was twenty years old and lived in Cambridge, Massachusetts.  My copy of Jill Johnston’s Marmalade Me, a collection of Johnston’s Village Voice dance columns, was purchased for two dollars at the Harvard Coop in Cambridge in the early 1970s. The Coop sales receipt is still in the book ($2.53), just as the 1970s sales receipt is still in another paperback Coop purchase, volume five (1947-1955) of Anais Nin’s diary ($3.13).


    I was a big Anais Nin fan in the 1970s. Nin’s literary fans were mostly women who also tended to keep diaries. Literary oriented males knew Nin primarily as one of Henry Miller’s lovers (and financial supporters). When Anais Nin was scheduled to speak in a church hall near Harvard I made sure that I was sitting up front and center. I had just read her book, ‘The Novel of the Future,’ and her book of stories, Under a Glass Bell. Nin was famous for her extraordinary book titles although I found her fiction too poetic and abstract. Her stories lacked verve and nerve.
      At the Harvard lecture, Nin appeared onstage in a long cape, her distinctive voice ringing out like a song bird. She spoke slowly, occasionally turning her head in a slow motion fashion that reminded me of a wind up doll. Her famous eyebrows, arched and dark penciled in to look like a sketch by Cocteau, could be seen from the far end of the room. As I listened to her speak I couldn’t help but imagine her making love to writer Henry Miller in Nin’s houseboat on the Seine in Paris, ink wells and flower pots crashing to the floor as that rake Miller put an end to the diarist’s delicacy.



     This was the beginning of the feminist era, when ardent feminists everywhere were proclaiming, “A woman needs a man like a fish needs a bicycle.” (This was a lie because every feminist I knew then seemed to have a skinny boyfriend). Nin attracted women who were more literary than feminist but the feminists were out in force during that church hall lecture. What I did not know then was that Nin’s lecture created some controversy so that a symposium took place the following day in which Nin  was asked to explain what she meant by this or that statement. Years later, I was able to read the transcript of this interview online and came away feeling amazed at how the interviewer failed to ruffle Nin’s feathers.  Nin seemed to have the ability to take any vehement opposing view and work it to her advantage.   


Jill Johnston


   What I found most amusing then was the fact that many women in the audience brought their own diaries to the lecture. Some of the women were even dressed in capes but I don’t remember if any of them had plucked or penciled- in their eyebrows.
   
    The Boston-Cambridge area was intellectually rich when it came to writers and artists.
   In a popular gay bar, Sporters on Cambridge Street (across the street from Massachusetts General Hospital), I met a novelist named Michael Arnold
who lived in the Boston suburbs with his parents but isolated himself in a separate studio apartment in their house where he wrote all day.



    Arnold had published two hardback novels, an historical novel about Archduke Ferdinand and the start of World War I, and a historical romance novel without a single gay character. If you were gay and a published author at that time and didn’t have any gay characters in your work, you were not somebody the “community” was necessarily going to respect. Although being in the closet then was rather common, there seemed to be another standard for authors and artists. So called ‘closeted writing’ was seen as dishonest and out of keeping with the times (this was the beginning of gay liberation, after all), whereas a Harvard writer like Jonathan Strong, who published Tike and Five Stories when Arnold was publishing his heterosexual romances, (Strong still continues to write and publish) made it obvious that one could at least be half honest when it came to homosexuality. Strong’s stories had a strong gay accent without ever spelling things out whereas Arnold seemed to be the opposite end of the spectrum. 



        Sporters, located at the base of Beacon Hill, reflected the bohemian accent of the Hill. It was a bar where everybody of all ages felt at home; a bar where old gay men didn’t seem quite so isolated and “pathetic.” All ages seemed to merge together in Sporters in a way that I haven’t seen before or since. The bar had a democratizing air, especially when the jukebox played The Age of Aquarius from Hair.
       Sporters attracted the likes of Alan Helms, author of Young Man From the Provinces: A Gay Life Before Stonewall, and a young lawyer named Dermont Meagher, who would later become the first out judge in Boston’s Municipal Court. Meagher would go on to write Judge Sentences: Tales from the Bench, about his experiences as a judge. One reviewer wrote that Meagher’s book “suggests a form of justice that is rendered with kindness and a sense of humor, rather than with Old Testament harshness and judgment. . . .”  



 
   I knew both Helms and Meahger. Meagher, intensely Irish looking, could have been a member of the Cape Cod Kennedy clan. In Sporters, we would often share a beer and talk.
        Helms, who had just moved to Boston after a glamorous life in New York as an actor and model (his friends included Anthony Perkins, Marlene Dietrich, Noel Coward and Leonard Bernstein) and I met at an after hours orgy in a private home on Commonwealth Avenue. In those (pre-AIDS) days it was not all that unusual to hear somebody in the bar announce after “last call” the address of a party/and or orgy:

   “Orgy at 119 Commonwealth Avenue!”

   Open invitations like this meant that everyone who heard the call was invited. These events attracted hundreds of men and were usually hosted by wealthy Bostonians with immense townhouses so there was plenty of room for an ever expanding crowd. At this particular orgy—my first and last—Helms and I sat it out, observing the goings on with detached fascination. You can imagine my surprise when, many years later, Helms made a lengthy reference to me in Young Man From the Provinces, even if he labeled me an “artist” rather than a writer. 

   “In Boston,” Helms wrote, “I could see the sky; in the Public Gardens, I rediscovered the miracle of trees for the first time since childhood. The city was beautiful by American standards, also much cleaner than New York and the pace was slower. Like Paris, Boston went to sleep at night, which was some help in my doing the same…”

Dermont Meagher


      Arnold the novelist (not the famous Michael Arnold publishing currently) was the size of Mozart, a petite man-boy with a page boy haircut who spent his time in Sporters on a bar stool surrounded by adoring fans. His fans weren’t especially literary types but I could see that they were well heeled men focused on status and being seen with the right people, an unfortunate staple in the gay world. Arnold took a liking to me and asked me a dozen questions when we met.

   “The only way to be a writer is to make a pot of coffee in the morning and then write for at least five hours,” he told me, all the while taking long drags from his cigarette. Arnold was a big smoker and all of his gestures seemed to be based on how he held his cigarette. He had the air of a Hollywood starlet, affected, caustic, with lots of “Oh darling’s” thrown in for good measure.  I enjoyed watching him hold court, especially the way he’d flip his hair off his forehead while taking those long cigarette drags. 


Sporters, dingy looking but oh-so-terrific. The homeless man is misleading. Obviously this picture was taken just before the bar closed forever. There were no homeless people lounging around like this in 1971-72, etc. .  

    Arnold was always asking me if I had a good coffee pot.

    I assured him that I had a good coffee pot before asking whether his books ever dealt with homosexuality. When Arnold answered no, I asked him if he cared anything at all about the gay movement. “Does your family know you’re gay?” I inquired in my best gay lib militia voice.     




   “I don’t know what they know. I write for the market,” Arnold told me, blowing smoke in an arc over the heads of two of his fans, both handsomely suntanned guys who had just returned from Provincetown. (In Boston, everyone had suntans from Provincetown).

  “So your books don’t go into gay issues at all? There’s nothing…not even a hint of homosexuality? Not even the slightest hint?”

   “They are historical novels. My first novel was reviewed by The New York Times. I want my books to sell. If I were to write about homosexuality my books would gather mold. Tell me about your work.”

    What Arnold was saying of course was that he was in the closet. Out of the Closets into the Streets meant nothing to him. He was interested only in making money. In my judgmental 20 year old frame of mind, I pegged him as a literary sell out.  

   I’ve Googled Michael Arnold’s name many times over the years and have found nothing about him except references to his first book and even fewer references to his second novel, both of which he made sure I had a copies of. My guess is that Michael Arnold is no longer with us, while Helms continues to write and live in Boston, as does Meagher, who is also an accomplished pen and ink artist.
   

Thom Nickels
Contributing Editor